In the year 2016, Microsoft introduced a new framework called .Net Core. Basically, it is not an updated version of the existing .net framework. Microsoft developed this framework as a totally new framework. In today’s web development world, everyone wants to develop web applications based on the secure, scalable, flexible and cloud-ready framework. So, if we want to use Asp.Net Core in today in place of Asp.Net MVC, then before using this we need to understand we are the benefits we can achieve from this new technology and also, what are the new features which are not available in the previous version of .Net Framework. So, in this article, we mainly focused on discussing the difference between Asp.Net MVC and Asp.Net Core.
In Asp.Net Core, there are several benefits or advantages we can achieve over Asp.Net MVC. As per the Microsoft, Asp.Net Core could be a framework that is compatible with building each internet and cloud applications. It is basically a fully open-source platform.
ASP.Net Core is a cross-platform framework. So, using this framework we can develop any applications for any operating systems like Windows, Linux, macOS etc. We can use this framework for developing web applications, console application or desktop applications which can be deployed in any operating systems. Also, this framework Cloud environment for development and deployments.
PROJECT STRUCTURE CHANGE
DOES NOT DEPENDS ON IIS FOR HOSTING
As we have already discussed that Asp.Net Core is a Cross-Platform framework, so we can host Asp.Net Core applications not only in IIS but also it can be hosted in the Nginx, Apache, Docker etc. So, we can host the asp.net core application in the Linux webserver using Nginx. In this case, Kestrel will act as an internal web server for processing request.
In case of installation of an associated application that is developed within the .Net framework, it's perpetually one package installation and conjointly needed some runtime surroundings for the Windows in operating systems. But since .Net Core could be cross-platform, therefore application developed during this framework got to be prepackaged and put in severally for the package. Developers have to compile the Nuget packages including within the .Net Core.
SUPPORT FULL .NET AND .NET CORE
Since .NET Core doesn't support all the options and functionalities provided by the most recent version of .NET Framework. However, it's going to be used as a collection of the .NET Framework. Also, .NET Core continues to be compatible with .NET Framework through the .NET traditional Library. Hence, the developers can still run the applications developed with .NET Framework once upgrading to .NET Core.
MODULAR COLLECTION OF LIBRARY
Both .NET Framework and .NET Core permits developers to require advantage of sturdy category libraries. But .NET Core uses a redesigned common language runtime named as CoreCLR, and choices a customary assortment of libraries named as CoreFX. Hence, the developers have the option to decide and use entirely the libraries required by each application and enhance the application’s performance by removing superfluous libraries.
MOBILE APP DEVELOPMENT
.NET Framework does not embrace any durable framework or tools to the mobile app development. But .NET Core compatible with Xamarin with the help of the .NET commonplace Library. Hence, developers can make the most of Xamarin to place in writing cross-platform mobile apps in C# with a shared code base with the help of the same APIs. They're going to a lot of using the tools provided by Xamarin to customize the mobile app for individual mobile platforms like Android, iOS and Windows Phone.
In case of .Net Core, this framework makes the developer life very easy to develop microservice oriented systems which is too much completed in case of standard .Net Framework. Intrinsically systems embrace a variety of freelance and dynamic microservices, the developers have to be compelled to concentrate on individual microservices. .NET Core permits programmers to develop custom microservices by mistreatment variable programming languages, technologies, and frameworks. Also, the developers can build a powerful system by combining multiple microservices seamlessly.
PERFORMANCE AND QUANTIFIABILITY
.NET Core is additional sensible than .NET Framework to bolster the performance and quantifiability of applications. It permits developers to bolster the performance of applications drastically whereas not deploying any hardware or infrastructure. Also, it permits developers to create, check and deploy applications directly at the environment of the cloud. Hence, the developers can switch to .NET Core to bolster the performance and quantifiability of their applications whereas not put over time and energy.
Source : https://goo.gl/pgjPfm
We can add reference of any assembly, library or any third-party package with the help of Nuget Packages. When we run the download of these packages using NuGet Manager Console, all the packages have been downloaded in the Packages folder within the Project folder hierarchy. ASP.NET Core came up with storing all the packages related to its development in Users folder and whereas creating ASP.NET Core applications, Visual Studio will reference them from Users folder. This feature is called Runtime Store for .NET Core a try of presently though you have got around 100 sample ASP.NET Core applications, all of them area unit referencing from dotnet in Users folder that's almost few MBs entirely.
SERVER-SIDE AND CLIENT-SIDE DEPENDENCE
In case of .Net Frameworks, we mean developers are very much familiar with how to reference a dll or a Nuget Packages in a project or solution using Visual Studio IDE. So, with the help of Visual Studio IDE, we can deploy our applications in operating systems including Windows, Linux or Unit.
IN BUILD DEPENDENCY INJECTION (DI)
Dependency Injection (DI) achieves loosely coupled, additional testable code in the applications. In ASP.NET MVC 5/4 or classic ASPX based mostly applications, we tend to use to own separate DI containers used like Unity, AutoFac, StructureMap etc. We had to form up our project to use DI, its additional effort.
In ASP.NET Core applications, dependency injection is inherent i.e. no setup headache for DI. simply produce some services and obtainable to use DI. In the case of sample .Net Core MVC Applications, sample projects always used inherited DI in the code (especially in Startup.cs file). With the help of this files, we can implement any type of configuration like EF, Authentication etc and also implement custom service as we required.